RestPOS & StockFlow
Agencies estimate software they never live with
Own the consequences of our estimates
Two products, built and run by us
Both in production
Plate 07 — POS counterSoftware we live with.
Not client work. Two products we built, own, ship and support.
Most agencies estimate software they will never have to live with. We set ourselves the opposite condition: own products end to end — architecture, support burden, migrations — so our estimates come from experience, not optimism.
Estimates without consequences
Support burden unknown
Architecture debt invisible
Before
- Estimates from optimism
- Software shipped in slides
- Support as afterthought
After
- Estimates from experience
- Products run in production
- Support with a name
What we set out to prove.
Run our own software in production, not in slides.
Feel every architecture decision and support burden ourselves.
Build module-first so systems grow without rewrites.
Let our own products inform how we scope client systems.
Purchase to report, inside StockFlow.
Two products. Every hand in the shop.
The day, closed with numbers.
Orders in, bills out — RestPOS.
A display, not a paper rail.
Stock that matches the shelf.
Statements from the same record.
Illustrative screens, real products.
Illustrative UI — not product screenshots.
Stock, purchasing and movement on one record.
From order to bill to closed day.
Reports that are already up to date.
Estimates from experience.
Every architecture decision, support burden and migration headache in these products informs how we scope yours. It’s the difference between an agency that estimates software and one that has lived with the consequences of its own estimates.
Plate 08 — kitchen displayThe products.
Both products in production, run and supported by us — every scoping estimate we give is informed by them.